@todayshow, are you listening?
The below snapshot of my favorite Tweets captures the conversation around the Today Show, particularly their efforts of late to actively join the Twitter conversation. Let me preface my post by saying, I have used Twitter to get the word out and incite conversation about a particular topic or news category. I struggled with @onecontest, a twitter account I managed for a former client. It was very time consuming and if you have to think too hard about what "message" to post, it just doesn't seem worth it.
Those behind @todayshow-- follow a few simple rules and we will play.
1. Only follow people once. If you want to get someones attention to follow you, @ them, responding to something they have posted, even if it's just a link. Make it relevant and they will follow.
2. Even when you are as big as the Today Show, start out with small targeted friendships and test the water. Learn and continue to grow your network organically and through gradually following others over time. You will have a much more engaged and loyal audience this way. Also, you want to keep the following-to-follower ratio as equal as you can. Following 1935 tweeters, when only 215 are actually following you back, raises a red flag reading "spitter" (reference: @cspenn).
3. Do NOT post 2 or more in a row (unless you are broadcasting a national emergency). I love the fresh news and links in my Twitter stream and I am sure others do too, but don't shoot them like spitballs at us.
We're a family, if you want to join, come sit at the table.
Those behind @todayshow-- follow a few simple rules and we will play.
1. Only follow people once. If you want to get someones attention to follow you, @ them, responding to something they have posted, even if it's just a link. Make it relevant and they will follow.
2. Even when you are as big as the Today Show, start out with small targeted friendships and test the water. Learn and continue to grow your network organically and through gradually following others over time. You will have a much more engaged and loyal audience this way. Also, you want to keep the following-to-follower ratio as equal as you can. Following 1935 tweeters, when only 215 are actually following you back, raises a red flag reading "spitter" (reference: @cspenn).
3. Do NOT post 2 or more in a row (unless you are broadcasting a national emergency). I love the fresh news and links in my Twitter stream and I am sure others do too, but don't shoot them like spitballs at us.
We're a family, if you want to join, come sit at the table.


"We're a family, if you want to join, come sit at the table. "
Great tips and insight on our Twitter community.
Posted by: Amanda Mooney | September 29, 2007 at 02:20 PM
Great post, J.R. Maybe you can get the ear of someone at NBC involved in this through NewMediaJim.
I would only add to your list, "Be a person, not a Thing." You should either have a single person assigned to make the Tweets, or let various people post but identify themselves. This is what RocketBoom does. Whoever does the posting should start with a small group of friends and talk to them. Be personable, make friends, talk about your kids, your cats, or your sports teams. Bitch about your spouse. Be human. We Twitterers don't like corporations, we like people.
Posted by: Joe Cascio | September 29, 2007 at 03:14 PM
I like the list and Amanda's addition. It's worrisome when people forget that they're people. It's even worse when marketers forget that WE are people.
Posted by: Amanda Gravel | October 01, 2007 at 10:14 AM
Right on Julia. Exactly right.
Posted by: Jack Hodgson | October 02, 2007 at 10:27 AM
I DM'd @Todayshow saying i'd be happy to help them with their endeavor, but never heard back from them. I don't even know who's behind the effort.
The only point where i differ from Amanda Mooney is "*&%$! about your spouse" She-who-must-be-obeyed reads mine. That woudln't be good for anybody. ;-)
Posted by: Jim Long | October 02, 2007 at 10:27 AM
Jim, you are not included among the NBC hate. It's you and Heroes I'm sticking with
Posted by: Doug Haslam | October 04, 2007 at 10:05 AM
Hi Jack Hodgson and Amanda G. - I posted the first comment; Joe C. made the comment I believe you are both referring to.
Posted by: Amanda Mooney | October 07, 2007 at 02:29 AM
Hi Jack Hodgson and Amanda G. - I posted the first comment; Joe C. made the comment I believe you are both referring to.
Posted by: Amanda Mooney | October 07, 2007 at 02:30 AM
Hi Jack Hodgson and Amanda G. - I posted the first comment; Joe C. made the comment I believe you are both referring to.
Posted by: Amanda Mooney | October 07, 2007 at 02:30 AM
Hi Jack Hodgson and Amanda G. - I posted the first comment; Joe C. made the comment I believe you are both referring to.
Posted by: Amanda Mooney | October 07, 2007 at 02:30 AM
Julia, this is the best thing I've read about Twitter branding in a long time, thanks. I twit-spit it out as such (ha ha). You know I work with the gov't and I have been thinking and writing about gov't branding (http://mashable.com/2008/09/03/government-brand/). No doubt that your analysis of Today Show, Best Buy, etc. also applies to different gov't entities trying to use the online tools - some are 'organic' and some are 'forced' --- see the mashable article for an analysis of gov't twitter usage!!
Posted by: Mark Drapeau | October 04, 2008 at 10:02 AM